UPPSC Intelligence
दैनिक नोट्सMCQ अभ्यासमेंस प्रश्नPDF स्टोरLive Mains
Englishहिंदी
दैनिकMCQमेंसPDFsमेंस
✈️Telegram पर जुड़ें💬UPPSC Intelligence सुधारने में मदद करें☕Developer को Coffee पिलाएं — ₹99

© 2026 UPPSC Intelligence. सर्वाधिकार सुरक्षित।

Powered by Aivora Labs

दैनिक नोट्सMCQ अभ्यासमेंस प्रश्नPDF स्टोर
हमारे बारे मेंगोपनीयता नीतिअस्वीकरणसंपर्क करें

पुरालेख

नवीनतम

कोई पुरालेख नहीं

पुरालेख

नवीनतम

कोई पुरालेख नहीं

मेंस प्रश्न

Beta

UPPSC विश्लेषणात्मक प्रश्न — आदर्श उत्तर के साथ · 2026-05-06

🔧 यह सुविधा सक्रिय विकास में है — विश्लेषणात्मक गहराई और विषय संश्लेषण लगातार सुधारे जा रहे हैं।

WhatsAppX
Ad
1
GS2 — राजव्यवस्था व शासन2026-05-06

The Supreme Court's judgment striking down the Electoral Bonds Scheme marks a significant moment in India's democracy. Critically examine the constitutional implications of this ruling with reference to the right to information, electoral finance, and institutional accountability. (150 words)

Art. 19(1)(a)Proportionality DoctrineElectoral BondsECICorporate DonationsTransparency
आदर्श उत्तर देखें

परिचय

In Association for Democratic Reforms v. Union of India (2024), a five-judge bench unanimously struck down the Electoral Bonds Scheme, ruling it violated Art. 19(1)(a). The judgment expands the right to information into the political finance domain.

मुख्य बिंदु

  • ◆Constitutional basis: Art. 19(1)(a) (free speech) held to include citizens' right to know the source of political funding — not just governmental action
  • ◆Proportionality test: Court applied the doctrine of proportionality — scheme was not 'narrowly tailored' to the legitimate aim of reducing black money
  • ◆Institutional accountability: SBI directed to disclose bond data to Election Commission (Art. 324), restoring ECI's oversight role
  • ◆Corporate governance angle: Unlimited corporate donations without disclosure undermined Art. 19(1)(a) and distorted level playing field in elections
  • ◆Critical analysis: While ruling strengthens transparency, it does not address alternative funding channels (shell companies, trusts) which remain opaque
  • ◆UP linkage: UP, as India's largest state by electorate, disproportionately affected by opaque political funding — ruling has significant state-level governance implications

टॉपर का आगे का रास्ता

💡

Way forward: Parliament must enact a comprehensive Electoral Finance Reform Law with mandatory disclosure, donation caps, and independent audit mechanism under CAG/ECI oversight.

2
GS3 — अर्थव्यवस्था व पर्यावरण2026-05-06

The recovery of Gharial population in the National Chambal Sanctuary demonstrates the efficacy of ecosystem-based conservation. Analyse the role of state cooperation, legal frameworks, and community participation in wildlife conservation in India, with special reference to Uttar Pradesh. (150 words)

Wildlife Protection Act 1972WII DehradunProject CrocodileMoEFCCIndicator SpeciesTri-state Conservation
आदर्श उत्तर देखें

परिचय

The Gharial (Gavialis gangeticus), once reduced to fewer than 200 individuals, now numbers 2,000+ in the National Chambal Sanctuary — a tri-state conservation success across UP, MP, and Rajasthan.

मुख्य बिंदु

  • ◆Legal framework: Wildlife Protection Act 1972, Schedule I — provides highest protection; Project Crocodile (1975) under MoEFCC enabled captive breeding via WII
  • ◆Tri-state coordination: Chambal sanctuary spans UP–MP–Rajasthan; success required synchronised enforcement and anti-poaching patrols — rare inter-state conservation model
  • ◆Ecosystem integrity: Chambal is India's only undammed major river; absence of industrial effluents key to fish availability for Gharial (fish-eater)
  • ◆UP contribution: Etawah district (UP stretch) hosts highest Gharial density; UP Forest Department runs hatchery-based supplementation programme
  • ◆Indicator species value: Gharial recovery signals clean river → downstream benefit to Gangetic Dolphin, Indian Skimmer, and riparian communities
  • ◆Critical gap: Mahanadi and Girwa River populations remain critically low; climate change-induced floods threaten nesting sites

टॉपर का आगे का रास्ता

💡

Way forward: Extend tri-state model to Girwa/Mahanadi rivers; integrate Gharial corridors into National River Conservation Plan; strengthen community steward programmes for nest protection.

💡 सुझाव: पहले खुद उत्तर लिखें, फिर आदर्श उत्तर से तुलना करें। 150 शब्द — 10 मिनट।